No joking, BSL advocates can write how-to-manuals for almost anything and everything dysfunctional. Case in point-
1. Known knowledge of suspected psychical , mental and/or sexual abuse by family member.
2. Negligence
Both those seem like a great idea, right? How about this?
I suspect this more based on the breed of dog than the actual action. I’m about 99.99% sure that Kendall would not care if the dog was a lab.
Kendall shared this in the hate group Dangerous Dogs. Kendall shared this with one intent: Find Supporters to Help Kendall Harass another Family.
You’ve got to what? Try to take away her children? Because she won’t run off and kill the family dog because you don’t like the breed?
I wanted to point something out-
“She walked outside for 1 minute!!!”- the foul mouth failure of a human being Patricia points out. Who else also left their son for a undisclosed amount of time while she went upstairs to do God only knows what, failed to hear the dog attack and yet is a spokesperson for Daxton’s Friends?
Angela Rutledge guilty of child endangerment that led to the result of her child’s death? Oh absolutely. So, once I see BSL advocates stop picking and choosing what they feel is endangerment than I will start believing they actually care about children.
No fears- these screen shots have been sent to the mother so she understands just what kind of man is slithering around her family.
After speaking to this family, you can see how quickly BSL advocates start harassing this young woman. The Facebook post was posted to Dangerous Dogs 7 hours ago and within hours this mother started receiving hateful messages from a well known BSL advocate who makes it her mission to harass pit bull owners.
This is the instant message initiated by Julie Wall to a complete stranger, Mrs. Coulter
This is what makes BSL advocates that follow Dogsbite.org & Daxton’s Friends so dangerous. Unbeknownst to the parent, these people take images of your family, children and dogs and post them in groups filled with strangers that have no issue reposting those images in other hate groups.
These people endanger children daily. The picture of Mrs. Coulter was shared on a private Facebook with family members, not once did she give permission for images of her child to be used in any hate group.
Once again, these BSL Advocates have threatened the welfare of this child. We know these groups have members that are convicted felons, members that obsess over unnatural sexual acts with animals and have a history of making inappropriate sexual comments to under age girls. That child is far safer beside that dog then any member of Dogsbite.org & Daxton’s Friends.
(Permission from the mother to let us share the image with her child obtained.)
So sending unsolicited, harassing messages to total strangers is a habit of Julie Wall’s? And here we thought the big pitbull lobby was special. How disappointing…
LikeLike
She could probably put you to shame.
LikeLike
She certainly tried to shame us with an an unsolicited, 660-word rant about why Luke and Babette should have a break stick. We replied with a short video: http://youtu.be/vkJady6fyhc
LikeLike
660 words? Whew…. That’s a short one!
LikeLike
Put us to shame she did (for not owning a breakstick). Below is the full text of her unsolicited harassment, and this video was the “big pitbull” lobby’s reply: http://youtu.be/vkJady6fyhc
So in children’s book, Galunker are they going to tell parents that all pit guardians should carry a breakstick and tell them Pit bull Rescue Central admits MOST pit bulls are not safe around other dogs. For that reason alone is why I do not consider them safe family pets for our neighborhoods. These are powerful animals that break away from their guardians all the time and maul & kill another beloved pet or person in front of a child or person. This is a typical pit attack on another animal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBFb-hGWZqg Breaking up pit attacks is dangerous 1/3 end up attacking the person that’s breaking up the fight. http://dogbitelaw.com/dangerous-vicious-dogs/a-propensity-to-attack-other-dogs-means-a-dog-is-dangerous-to-people.html “According to Pit Bull Rescue Central, the leading authority of pit-bull type dogs, “It is a FACT that our pit bulls, AmStaffs and pit mixes come with a built-in fighting heritage.It doesn’t matter where we get them from, whether it be the pound, a stray we pick up, or a puppy we buy from a breeder. The majority of pit bulls will, at some point in their lives, exhibit some degree of dog-on-dog aggression. This type of animal aggression is completely separate from human-aggression; a well-socialized pit bull is very good-natured with people.Yet, chances are that a “normal” pit bull will not share his affection with other animals.We cannot predict when or where it will happen and we can’t love, train or socialize it out ofthe dog. Pit bulls may not start fights, but they will finish them.” http://www.pbrc.net/misc/PBRC_dogpark.pdf”
The Pit Bull Rescue Central recommends ALL pit guardians to have a break stick. FOR ME THIS IS ANOTHER RED FLAG! Does not sound like a safe family pet if you need a breakstick. “Since pit bulls have a strong fighting background, we recommend that pet owners also have a breaking stick as a precaution, even if they don’t plan to use it in an illegal context. However, please be discreet. Breaking sticks are not something to brag about and the general pubic might have the wrong impression if you walk around with a stick in your hand. Breaking sticks are not illegal, but they are considered dog fighting paraphernalia in certain states and/or with certain law enforcement agents. http://www.pbrc.net/breaksticks.html
I appreciate that ‘Pit bull Rescue Central,’ is telling pit-bull guardians not to take their dog to off-leash parks but many pit guardians are still very ignorant to this recommendation. What is bewildering to me is that Pit Bull Rescue Central admits that other beloved dogs in the community are not safe around pit-bulls because of their genetic makeup but promotes them as a great family pet. For me this is a red flag that you are compromising public safety and the safety of our beloved pets in our communities. These are powerful dogs that break away free from pit guardians all the time and then go maul or kill a beloved pet or a person. I do not consider that a safe family pet for our community. Of all the dog breeds, they are the all time number one killer of humans and other people’s beloved pets. http://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2014.php Children & adults have watched their beloved pets be mauled to death by pit bulls. Many develop PSTD after watching a horrific pit attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZTiGWgQubA Then these pit-bull advocates are oblivious and offended why people do not want these dogs in the neighborhood. REALLY? Are you really that blind? Do I really have to spell it out for you? Many people in the neighborhood have beloved pets that they consider family members. They are concerned for their pet’s safety and they do not want their dog to get mauled to death. Now people in the neighborhood who have pets have to live in fear if this powerful pitbull will get away from the guardian and hurt or kill their beloved pet. Almost all dog guardians have experience a mishap where their dog gets away from them by mistake.
LikeLike
She sent a message to you on Facebook? What a loser!
LikeLike
That freaking Isabella person posted the photo of a baby in a wading pool on the confessions page. Without blurring out the face. And made a disgusting remark about the baby being a snack. A freaking snack!!!!! Do you need that screenshot??
LikeLiked by 1 person
I got it! 😂 they totally make it to easy at times.
LikeLike
Came across this blog post after a quick Google search of Julie Wall and BSL…while in the midst of trolling her and her idiotic posts on a local new article lol She’s a piece of work. (or at least a piece of something)
http://www.nbc4i.com/story/28535090/newark-council-votes-to-keep-pit-bull-vicious-label
LikeLiked by 1 person